Home Camera What is IR Pollution and How Do You Combat it? Using Tiffen’s Academy Award Winning IR Filters

What is IR Pollution and How Do You Combat it? Using Tiffen’s Academy Award Winning IR Filters

written by Shane Hurlbut, ASC

image001_sm

What is Infrared Pollution? How do you combat it? We have the answers for you. Here’s a look at IR pollution on the Blackmagic URSA demonstrated by using Straight WWND. (We will dive further into this later on in the article.)

image003

For beginners shooting without ND filtration, you wouldn’t have encountered this. For those shooting Sony, Canon DSLRs or Cinema cameras you might not have either, because those cameras include an internal Optical Low Pass Filter or “OLPF” with an IR-Cut filter.

Here is RED’s Skin Tone-Highlight OLPF:

image007_sm

 

For anyone on a different camera system, this is likely a problem that you have experienced. Even if you know how to fight the problem of IR pollution, here is some more information you may find helpful.

I will try not to be too boring about this. In oversimplified terms, CMOS or CCD digital sensors have a matrix of layered photodiodes. It’s actually more complicated than this but essentially each layer provides sufficient wavelength separation to the different color signals, i.e. red, green, and blue. The way that they’re designed pushes the sensitivity of the diodes beyond the visible spectrum, into Ultraviolet and Infrared light. Basically, unlike film, these digital sensors are inherently more sensitive to light stretching into the non-visible spectrum.

Yeah, Ok? So what does this mean? If you’ve experienced color shift while using ND filters, this will help explain why.

Here is a look at how IR pollution manifests itself on the RED Dragon.

image009_smimage011_smimage013_sm

We will dive further into RED IR Pollution in a moment. Our Straight ND test can be viewed here. Be sure to watch these RED tests in 4K!

RED Dragon IR Pollution Test: Tiffen Straight ND Filters

Regular Neutral Density filters block the visible spectrum but do not block infrared light. The IR light travels unimpeded through the filter and lands on the photodiodes. Even though the input is not a true color, the diode interprets it as data and represents it as a displayable color. Infrared light is at the red end of the spectrum, so this data is often interpreted as more red pixels. Thus, we get the shift in color that you may have noticed in your footage.

Tiffen has two major ways of combatting this problem.

Hot Mirrors
image009_sm

The Hot Mirror IRND filters reflect the infrared light using a polarization method before it even contacts the sensor. This is actually quite brilliant and sounds amazing on paper. However, there is something to be aware of with these filters. As you increase the ND, the polarization effect is amplified to cut the infrared light. This ends up rendering skin tone in an unpleasing manner; basically, it drains the life from the face.

Here is what we are talking about. Notice how the skin reacts to the Hot Mirror differently than the IR Filter.

image017_sm
image019_sm
image021_sm

Have a look for yourself in the video. We also have the side-by-side comparisons further down as well.

RED Dragon IR Filtration Test #1: Tiffen Hot Mirror IR ND

The other option that Tiffen offers is their Academy Award Winning Water White IRNDs. Simply put, these dye-based filters increase the level of green to compensate for the color shift from the IR pollution.

image011_sm

Here’s a side-by-side comparison of the Straight ND and the IRND. Shane I the sweet spot with these filters and camera combination to be the best with IRND 1.5 and 1.8.

image028_sm
image030_sm
image032_sm

An entire test of the IR filters can be seen here.

RED Dragon IR Filtration Test #2: Tiffen IR ND

RED Dragon IR Filtration Comparison Test #1: Tiffen IR ND vs Tiffen Straight ND

RED Dragon IR Filtration Comparison Test #2: Tiffen IR ND vs Tiffen IR Hot Mirrors

Some manufacturers, like Canon, have engineered OLPFs that help refract the IR light, referred to as “IR-Cut” filters. So on the Canon camera systems, you don’t need the IR filtration as their OLPF takes care of the pollution.

Here is an IR pollution test with the C500. You will notice that the Canon performs well without IRND.

image034_sm
image036_sm
image038_sm
image040_sm
image042_sm
image044_sm

However, other cameras need help and are only able to combat IR to a certain extent. The Arri Alexa cameras need help after 1.2 ND. Notice how the greens start to go brown.

image046

image048_smimage050_smimage052_smimage054_sm

Here is a side by side comparison of the Canon C500 and the Alexa to better demonstrate what we’re talking about.

image056_smimage058_smimage060_smimage062_smimage064_smimage066_sm

Here is a link to the previous full article for these tests: http://www.thehurlblog.com/2013/10/film-education-arri-alexa-vs-canon-c500-part-2/

We also put the RED Epic Mysterium-X up against the Canon C500. If you’re using a RED with this sensor, this test may be enlightening!

image068_sm
image070_sm
image072_sm
image074_sm
image076_sm

Here is it side-by-side with the Canon C500.

image078_sm

image080_sm

image082_sm

image084_sm

image086_sm

Here is a link to the previous full article for these tests: http://www.thehurlblog.com/2013/11/cinematography-online-red-epic-vs-canon-c500/

RED Dragon cameras need to combat IR pollution after .9 ND. Here are some screengrabs from our previously mentioned RED Dragon IR test.

image088_sm
image090_sm
image092_sm
image094_sm
image096_sm
image098_sm
image100_sm
image102_sm
image104_sm
image109_sm
image111_sm
image113_sm

The Blackmagic cameras need help after .6 ND.

image115
image117
image119
image121
image123
image125
image127
image129
image131
image133
image135
image137
image139
image141
image143

Here is the previous article for the URSA camera tests: http://www.thehurlblog.com/2014/12/director-of-photography-blackmagic-4k-ursa-tests-part-1/

So what does all this information mean? It means that you should account for this shift when adding your ND filtration. So be aware when you’re stacking IR filters. If you don’t take this into account, you will be adding excessive green to your image or introducing too much polarization to the skin tones.

IR pollution is different on different cameras because of the various ways in which each manufacturer’s sensors are sensitive to light, so your results and solutions will be different for different cameras. That’s why you see ND tests online that get wildly different results on different cameras with the same filters – underscoring the importance of testing equipment before a project. Luckily, we have done some of these for you already!

So at the end of the day, who cares about all this science/tech babble? It’s all about the story and the characters, right? Yes, exactly. Having this knowledge in your back pocket will make you a more technically advanced filmmaker. It gives a better understanding of the craft and allows you to control and master your aesthetic.

All videos were edited on HP Z840 workstations using HP Z24x DreamColor monitors.

Start Your Journey

Related Articles

11 comments

Matthew W October 8, 2015 at 10:02 AM

This is an epic post, I’ll have to read this a couple times. Do we have as much IR issues with the Arri Alexa? How about the internal NDs of the Amira and Alexa Mini?

Reply
Shane October 25, 2015 at 1:44 PM

Thank you. The Amira and the Alexa mini have no problem at all while using their internal NDs. The Alexa is good till about 1.2 worth of straight ND. Then you have to start adding IR.

Reply
Y November 25, 2015 at 11:16 PM

Hi Shane,

Does when you say 1.2, does it include the Internal ND? Or in addition to the internal ND? Meaning, if I use ND level 3 on Alexa Mini, do I have to use IRND 3 – 1.2? Or it’s okay uptill 1.2 even I have internal ND?

Reply
Shane December 14, 2015 at 9:23 PM

The Internal NDs on the Arri Mini as well as the Amira are beautiful. You will not have to add an IR ND. You can go with a straight. The internals are True NDs that combat the IR.

Reply
Ahmed October 8, 2015 at 12:45 PM

Hi Shane thank you for the very informative post . I know that you are very busy but if you add commentary to the clips it will become very kind from you . I have a question confusing me the oplf image in the post show the filter with magenta color glass so how it will defeat magenta if it look also magenta I was expect oplf look green . After reading this post I think there are something fishy in CCD structure for different cameras and the dilemma cameras manufacturers will hide these information
Regards
Ahmed

Reply
Shane October 25, 2015 at 1:44 PM

Hi Ahmed, I try to do commentary as much as I can but sometimes I cannot. IR pollution is brown, magenta. The IR glass is green. I am showing you that without the IR filter you will get that brown magenta.

Reply
Ahmed October 25, 2015 at 12:13 PM

Hi Shane .Please do to me a favor by answering these two questions .
1- May you give us a link to the color chart you are using to read more details about it ?
2 – why you do not use DSC Labs Front Box One Shot in color grading ?
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/979168-REG/dsc_labs_fbos_frontbox_oneshot_dailies_reference.html
Regards
Ahmed

Reply
Shane November 1, 2015 at 1:57 PM

Spyder Color Checker – http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/740518-REG/Datacolor_DC_SCK100_SpyderCheckr_Color_Calibration_Tool.html/BI/8721/KBID/9934/kw/DASC/DFF/d10-v2-t1-xDASC

Because the Spyder Checker is set up specifically for the Davinci Resolve 10 and 11 and it works really well to get you in the ball park.

Reply
Wezley October 10, 2016 at 12:56 PM

Hi Shane,

I have seen shift toward DOPs shooting with IR filter .3 – .9 for some reason.
1. Is this purely to save budget or do they have a legitimate reasoning behind this?
2. How badly does this effect the final grade when all the footage is green?
3. I’ve also noticed the over exposed white in the image then go magenta when the green in balanced, why is this?
4. Can you do an article about this please?

All the Best!
Wez

Reply
Shane Hurlbut, ASC December 19, 2016 at 6:29 PM

Hi Wez, I have done many articles on IR pollution and how to combat this.

http://www.thehurlblog.com/?s=IR+Pollution

Reply
Stewart November 4, 2016 at 3:33 AM

Just wondering out loud here,…
Is this in anyway related to the issues BMD have been facing, with owners complaining of a harsh magenta fringing on some cameras?
I use a set of ‘classic’ Pentax primes, and have seen a little of this on my personal K-01 and on BMCC, but not on a Sony A7s, FS-700 or FS-7 that these same lenses have been on, or on Aja Cion and Panasonic AF100.
The K-01 has an OLPF Anti-Aliasing filter, which has been done away with on the more recent K-3 and K-1 series where OLPF is simulated but Sensor Shift.
The AF100 has internal ND’s, and I believe they are of the same quality as those found in Panasonic ENG cameras.
I’m not 100% sure without re-reading the manual, but I think the Cion has IR cut in it’s OLPF on the sensor.

Reply

Leave a Comment